Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Animal Hoarding

(Image courtesy of pet-abuse.com)

To most of us, the idea of hoarding animals is bizarre. However, this is something that happens much too often. Watching "Animal Precinct" on the Animal Planet, can show just how often this takes place. According to The Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium, the following criteria are used to define animal hoarding:

  • More than the typical number of companion aniamls
  • Inability to provide even minimal standards of nutrition, sanitation, shelter, and veterinary care, with this neglect often resulting in starvation, illness, and death
  • Denial of the inability to provide this minimum care and the impact of that failure on the animals, the household, and human occupants of the dwelling.
While Illinois is the first and only state in the US to define animal hoarding in its state cruelty statute, Vermont and New Mexico have submitted, but not passed, similar legislation. However, in most states it is considered animal cruelty if a person cannot provide the animals with proper food, drink, shelter, sanitary environment, or protection from the weather. Therefore, animal hoarding should fall into the category of animal cruelty. Interestingly enough, people to hoard animals do it so they can "help" the animals...most of the time, the owners truly believe they are benefiting the animals.

This is an issue that is important to me. The dog I rescued was seized by the Humane Society of the Black Hills, South Dakota. The woman in South Dakota had hoarded over 200 dogs, all of which were seized to be adopted or fostered (read more about the story here). When I first rescued Zee, his coat was dull and matted, he had scars all over his body, and his canine incisors were ground down. Needless to say, he was fearful, anxious, and in need of vaccinations and neutering. Today, Zee's coat shines, he's house trained, healthy, and happy. Zee and the other dogs lacked human interaction, love, and care. The thirteen dogs that ended up in Gillette all had the same sad, scared faces.

Something needs to be done to eradicate pet hoarding. The effects of it are horrible, for the animals and the people involved. Please feel free to read more about the subject below.

http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/behind_closed_doors_the_horrors_of_animal_hoarding.html

http://www.tufts.edu/vet/cfa/hoarding/anwelf.htm#A1

Monday, October 29, 2007

Meet your Meat

I found this video in a few different places. Although I'm not a vegan or a vegetarian, I'm slowly weaning meat out of my diet and I do research on the animal product I do purchase. The conditions that most of these animals live in should be considered animal cruelty. If this video doesn't make you want to become a vegetarian, hopefully it raises concern about the treatment of farm animals. To watch the video, click on the link below and turn your volume on.

http://www.meat.org/

If you would like to aid in animal welfare, but are unsure whether or not you can become a vegetarian or vegan, please read the articles below. These articles have been copied from the Humane Society of the United State's website. To visit that site, please click here. I will write more about the subject of animals as food in later posts.

A Brief Guide to Egg Carton Labels and Their Relevance to Animals:

Certified Organic*: The birds are uncaged inside barns or warehouses, and are required to have outdoor access (although there have been concerns about lax enforcement, with some large-scale producers not providing birds meaningful access to the outdoors). They are fed an organic, all-vegetarian diet free of antibiotics and pesticides, as required by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program. Beak cutting and forced molting through starvation are permitted. Compliance is verified through third-party auditing.

Free-Range: While the USDA has defined the meaning of "free-range" for some poultry products, there are no standards in "free-range" egg production. Typically, free-range egg-laying hens are uncaged inside barns or warehouses and have some degree of outdoor access. They can engage in many natural behaviors such as nesting and foraging. However, there is no information on stocking density, the frequency or duration of outdoor access, or the quality of the land accessible to the birds. There is no information regarding what the birds can be fed. Beak cutting and forced molting through starvation are permitted. There is no third-party auditing.

Certified Humane*: The birds are uncaged inside barns or warehouses, but may be kept indoors at all times. They must be able to perform natural behaviors such as nesting, perching, and dust bathing. There are requirements for stocking density and number of perches and nesting boxes. Forced molting through starvation is prohibited, but beak cutting is allowed. Compliance is verified through third-party auditing. Certified Humane is a program of Humane Farm Animal Care.

Cage-Free: As the term implies, hens laying eggs labeled as "cage-free" are uncaged inside barns or warehouses, but generally do not have access to the outdoors. They have the ability to engage in many of their natural behaviors such as walking, nesting, and spreading their wings. Beak cutting and forced molting through starvation are permitted. There is no third-party auditing.

Free-Roaming: Also known as "free-range," the USDA has defined this claim for some poultry products, but there are no standards in "free-roaming" egg production. This essentially means the hens are cage-free. There is no third-party auditing.

United Egg Producers Certified*: The overwhelming majority of the U.S. egg industry complies with this voluntary program, which permits routine cruel and inhumane factory farm practices. By 2008, hens laying these eggs will be afforded 67 square inches of cage space per bird, less area than a sheet of paper. The hens are confined in restrictive, barren cages and cannot perform many of their natural behaviors, including perching, nesting, foraging or even spreading their wings. Compliance is verified through third-party auditing. Forced molting through starvation is prohibited, but beak cutting is allowed. This is a program of the United Egg Producers.

Vegetarian-Fed: These birds are provided a more natural feed than that received by most laying hens, but this label does not have significant relevance to the animals’ living conditions.

Natural: This label has no relevance to animal welfare.

Fertile: These eggs were laid by hens who lived with roosters, meaning they most likely were not caged.

Omega-3 Enriched: This label claim has no relevance to animal welfare.

The truth is that the majority of egg labels have little relevance to animal welfare or, if they do, they have no official standards nor any mechanism to enforce them. Only three labels listed below are programs with official, audited guidelines, but even those vary widely in terms of animal welfare. Those three are marked with an asterisk (*).


A Brief Guide to Meat and Dairy Labels and Their Relevance to Animal Welfare:


"Certified Organic"*: The animals must be allowed outdoor access, with ruminants—cows, sheep, and goats—given access to pasture. (Consumers should be aware that there have been concerns about lax enforcement, with some large-scale producers not providing meaningful access to the outdoors.) Animals must be provided with bedding materials. Use of hormones and antibiotics is prohibited. These are requirements under the National Organic Program regulations, and compliance is verified through third-party auditing. Currently, there are no federal or state programs to certify aquatic animals, including fish, as organic.

Free-Range Poultry: The birds should have outdoor access. However, no information on stocking density, the frequency or duration of how much outdoor access must be provided, nor the quality of the land accessible to the animals is given. Indeed, the only national guidelines for the term "free range" are basic U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) requirements that poultry raised for meat—but not for eggs—have some access to the outdoors. Producers must submit affidavits to the USDA that support their animal production claims in order to receive approval for this label.

Pasture-Raised and Grass-Fed: The animals have access to the outdoors and are able to engage in natural behaviors, such as grazing. However, no information on stocking density, the frequency or duration of how much outdoor access must be provided, nor the quality of the land accessible to the animals is given. Producers must submit affidavits to the USDA that support their animal production claims in order to receive approval for these labels.

"Certified Humane"*: The animals must be kept in conditions which allow for exercise and freedom of movement. As such, crates, cages, and tethers are prohibited. Outdoor access is not required. Stocking densities are specified to ensure animals are not overcrowded, and animals must be provided with bedding materials. Hormone and non-therapeutic antibiotic use is prohibited. Compliance is verified through third-party auditing. Certified Humane is a program of Humane Farm Animal Care.

Hormone-Free, rBGH-Free, rBST-Free, and No Hormones Added: These labels on dairy products mean the cows were not injected with rBGH or rBST, genetically engineered hormones that increase milk production. Hormones are commonly used to speed growth in beef production, and their use by both the beef and dairy industries are associated with animal welfare problems. Chicken and pig producers are not legally allowed to use hormones. These claims do not have significant relevance to the animals' living conditions. There may be some verification of this claim.

Cage-Free: As birds raised for meat, unlike those raised for eggs, are rarely caged prior to transport, this label on poultry products has virtually no relevance to animal welfare. However, the label is helpful when found on egg cartons, as most egg-laying hens are kept in severely restrictive cages prohibiting most natural behaviors, including spreading their wings.

Vegetarian-Fed: These animals are given a more natural feed than that received by most factory-farmed animals, but this claim does not have significant relevance to the animals’ living conditions.

Dolphin-Safe: In the United States, a Dolphin Safe label on a can of tuna means that no dolphins were intentionally chased, encircled, traumatized, injured, or killed in order to catch tuna swimming beneath the dolphins. Due to pressure from other countries, the U.S. government has made multiple attempts to weaken the rules and allow the use of the label even if the tuna were caught by deliberately setting nets on dolphins. The HSUS and others have won a series of lawsuits to maintain the integrity of the label, so a Dolphin Safe label in the United States still means that the tuna were not caught using methods that harm dolphins.

Natural: This claim has no relevance to animal welfare.

Grain-Fed: This claim has little relevance to animal welfare, but feeding ruminants—cows, sheep, and goats—high levels of grain can cause liver abscesses and problems with lameness. As such, beef products labeled "grain-fed" most likely come from animals who suffered lower welfare than beef products labeled "grass-fed."

"Free-Farmed"*: The animals must be kept in conditions which allow for exercise and freedom of movement. As such, crates, cages, and tethers are not prohibited. Outdoor access is not required. Stocking densities are specified to ensure animals are not overcrowded, and animals must be provided with bedding materials. Hormone and non-therapeutic antibiotic use is prohibited. Compliance is verified through third-party auditing. Free-Farmed is a program of American Humane.

No label: Most likely, the absence of a label means animals are raised in factory farm conditions that significantly reduce their welfare.

* The claims listed in quotation marks—Certified Organic, Certified Humane, and Free-Farmed—are programs with guidelines or standards, whereas the remaining claims are only labels.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

My Reason

I am not typically a blog-type person. I enjoy using private blogs to discuss songs and poetry. I never considered opening my own public blog until taking at course called "Writing Public Forums" at the University of Wyoming. I am still leery about the idea, but at my professor's command, my fellow students and I have created our own blogs.

As for the topic of my blog, I haven't decided on what I'd like to write about yet. I'm an animal lover and am interested in discussing animal welfare, no-kill vs. kill shelters, and animal cruelty, etc. Still, I haven't decided which area I'd like to explore and discuss. I plan on narrowing my search to find a topic I'm most interested in. If, however, I cannot narrow my topic, I may generalize animal welfare and discuss the different aspects of it.

With that being, welcome to my blog.